Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

I Witnessed

Monday, January 23rd, 2012 ·
by James Copple

The roads in eastern Ethiopia are difficult to navigate. They are water filled “canyons” with few markers to indicate direction. Large supply trucks, weighted down by their precious cargoes, are up to their axles in mud. Six of us were traveling in a Land Cruiser – an indispensible piece of equipment for this part of the world. One wag commented, “You want to get to Masai Mara, drive a Land Rover, you want to get home, drive a Land Cruiser.”

This five-hour, one way trip to several communities seemed like just one more humanitarian mission. For reasons I cannot totally explain, it became so much more.  Godare, a border community in dispute between Ethiopia and Somalia, hosts refugees while raided by rebels and terrorists alike. It is five miles from the Somali border. In just three months the camp has grown from 2,000 people to 25,000 people. Yet, international aid organizations such as UN agencies are not there. The border dispute prevents these agencies from doing their important work.

The four days we spent in eastern Ethiopia have affected me in a ways that no other journey has affected me.  In fact, I have not been able to write about it because anything I say seems premature, self-righteous, or judgmental.  The misery of famine and starvation, complicated by conflicts between faiths and political powers, washed over me and seemed to silence me. I felt broken on a rock of hopelessness that spilled any self-preserving detachment on to the ground to be soaked up by the horror of the moment. While nature caused the famine, politics and religion exacerbated it.  This suffering is preventable.

For four days I witnessed the choices made by parents and caregivers to either neglect or abandon their children because of starvation and fear. I watched human migration across barren lands in search of  food, water, or safety.  But perhaps, most disconcerting, I was a witness to the world’s neglect.  For certain, the usual suspects were present in Eastern Ethiopia – from faith-based NGOs seeking to put a finger in the dike to avert human suffering to a few global educators operating a school. There was no outrage, no anger, no urgency or call to action. People, both benefactors and beneficiaries moved through the motions of survival. There was a terrible sense of “normal.” I had seen this all before, but this time it just seemed different. It felt like I was becoming a witness to the worst in human experience.

A few days later, I came home to the hysterical debates of Congress and political campaigns during which the famine in the Horn of Africa and Kenya never received a remark.  In fact, in all the year-end reflections of 2011, nobody mentioned the famine and the number of people dying. As a witness to this horrible situation, I felt isolated and alone and every time I attempted to describe what I felt, people would simply stare. I felt like I was being a killjoy to the holiday festivities. Despite pleas by the ONE Foundation and other relief organizations with media capacity, nobody paid attention to the realities that over 30,000 children have died in the past three months. I went through my normal Christmas rituals of children and grandchildren, but I also felt lost and adrift.

I have grown stronger in recent days because of another fact associated with this experience – I was not only a witness to incredible suffering, I was also a witness to amazing courage. A group of Christians reached out to Muslims and offered them food and water. Because of religious conflict and persecution, I cannot mention their names nor their communities – but I can try to describe their acts. In this case, a small but committed Christian community worshipping underground had access to food and grains which they freely distributed to their Muslim neighbors. These Muslim neighbors told me how greatly they appreciated this act of compassion and care and how they wanted to join hands with their new friends to confront the immediate crisis of hunger and conflict. I witnessed Muslims embracing Christians and expressing gratitude for something so basic as a cup of water. I realized at that moment; I was witnessing the power of community action. Action at the community level that makes a neighbor more than an abstract concept but a person with a face, a person with a family, a person with dreams. These actions transcend religious and political conflict.

What has not been achieved in conference rooms, parliaments, or in complex negotiations is being achieved by tender acts of mercy. These acts are made possible by committed and dedicated individuals, often supported by generous donors thousands of miles away. Suddenly, I felt the bridge. Many people in the US and other parts of the developed world provide resources; courageous individuals living in remote parts of the Horn of Africa take those resources and convert them into sustainable acts of love and grace. Geopolitics aside in the global conflict between Muslim and Christian – faith based organizations and individuals go into the darkness of human suffering. They confront the noise of hate and subdue the violence with acts of charity and compassion.  Alas, I have been a witness to the worst of humanity and the best of humanity transformed by grace.

Finding Christ

Monday, April 11th, 2011 ·
by James Copple

It is Sunday in Nairobi and I was a little disappointed that I couldn’t make it to Church this morning because I scheduled myself to meet with a youth group in the Lunga Lunga Slum of Nairobi. About 40 youth organizing a trash pick up and putting the pieces together for a waste management business. I often go to slums and work in urban environments that are horrific in poverty, disease and crime. But this morning was different. I walked the narrow walkways between corrigated huts interviewing the youth leaders. The smells were so bad that three times I had to fight the gag reflex and I found myself not wanting to breath the toxic odors.

In these situations I become both angry and empathic. I go there to feel what they feel and try to understand their experience but I often leave like Amos outside the city gates of Jerusalem shouting at the oppressors. Huge multinationals surround this slum but they contribute little to its development. People I know and people I have become close with live in these huts. In my meetings they share their experience and each time I find they speak with a voice of hope and redemption. They are not defeated nor do they grow angry at their predicament. Rather, they work hard and struggle to make their place clean, safe and industrious. They don’t ask for handouts, they ask that we come along side and help them think through solutions and create opportunity.

I found Christ this morning and it wasn’t in a mega structure with all the trappings – I found him in the gentle smile of a child walking along the polluted Nairobi river trying to make sense out of his life and knowing that no amount of poverty or despair can remove his hope.

Yes, an Unapologetic Rant on the Arrogance of Power

Wednesday, March 9th, 2011 ·
by James Copple

capitol2In 1969, Professor Larry Hybertson, a history professor at Eastern Nazarene College suggested I read J. William Fulbright’s Arrogance of Power. Hybertson knew of my interest in all things political and thought this young college sophomore might find Fulbright’s analysis of power instructive. He was right. Periodically, I dust off the old paperback and revisit its arguments. At the heart of Fulbright’s analysis is how elected leaders become enamored with themselves and with the trappings of power and use both to manipulate the American people into the illusion that elected officials can actually effect change.

I just returned from a meeting on the Hill with one of the “club” members of the United States Senate that takes arrogance of power to a whole new level of sophistry. Listening to him rant about what he could or he would do with his new power and how he intended to shut down the wheels of government by bridling in spending was both pathetic and laughable. Congress as an institution of government is becoming increasingly irrelevant to what actually is happening in America. In reality, as one wag put it, “it is a pompous pimple on the epidermis of history.”

I suggested to him that he might find himself better served by ignoring his own press releases and taking a journey with me to places and with people who wake up every morning questioning their capacity to survive. And yet, they figure it out and move forward. In the press of poverty, hunger and disease, they become entrepreneurs and inventors determined to find ways to feed and clothe their families.

This Congress is determined to slash the programs that make it easier for these communities to survive, and thus making their institution both increasingly stupid and callous. This Senator and his Congressional Colleagues will spend $1 billion a week to fund the War to Nowhere in Afghanistan under the pretense of protecting American interests. In the process they will ignore the real interests of the American people to feed and to clothe their families and to care for their neighbor. With unemployment hovering around 9% and 25% of America’s children living in poverty – hang up the pretense to power found in the cloak rooms of Congress and begin finding ways to empower our communities to not only survive but to thrive.

As we reflect on the 40th anniversary of the inauguration of John F. Kennedy – his words, “Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country” should be chiseled into the conscience of every member of Congress and become part of their oath of office. This is the time for serious people – and this Congress does not appear to be serious.

They Will Know Us by Our Hate

Thursday, January 27th, 2011 ·
by James Copple

IMG_5748I think we can all affirm that God is neither Republican nor Democrat and I am relatively certain he is not a member of the Tea Party gang. God’s love and grace so transcends the language of culture that when we try to co-opt his presence and define him by ideologies or a political belief, we reduce him to everything that is scandalous and broken. Can we really be serious when we proof text our way through the scriptures to justify our political positions on guns, abortion, homosexuality, service to the poor, or our blind support of capitalism? The left and right are both guilty of these insane power struggles. We bastardize the scriptures and bring shame to their authors by suggesting we can prove any ideology from one, two or a thousand citations on a culturally driven issue.

Love God with your whole heart and mind and your neighbor likewise and then stand up and justify the murder of innocents, children or homosexuals in Uganda. Religious traditions on the right and the left justify their hate speech and language as being prophetic and taking a stand. “You have to stand up to evil,” so they claim. All the time not seeing the log in their own eye or the hypocrisy of a position that would justify murder, racism or making your political enemies the subject of hate speech.

When tempted to take your cultural and political ideologies and to wrap them around a set of scriptures, take Karl Barth’s advice and summarize your position with his simple response when asked if he thought the Bible was true: “Jesus loves me this I know for the Bible tells me so.” Live in love, grace and peace regardless of the lives and actions of your so-called enemies. Let’s be known for how we love and not how we hate justified by esoteric themes found in proof texting our scriptures.

Facebook and the Self-Righteous

Thursday, December 30th, 2010 ·
by James Copple

Nearly half a billion Facebook (FB) users around the world and I seldom find a person willing to admit they use Facebook. The most common Facebook Screenshotresponse to the question, are you on Facebook is “Who me? What a waste of time.” And, with that response there is the tone of self-righteousness that suggests that because they are not – they are a part of a social elite that is above the masses.

I must stipulate that some of my friends and family accuse me of a FB addiction. I am not sure it is an addiction, but I first came to FB motivated by the desire to keep my eight children and four brothers and sisters informed of my whereabouts and “save the world” activities. My “Friends” list has grown to 530 and I prune that list several times a year and rid myself of the extremists who want nothing more than to vilify Obama or Palin.

I do a status update once or twice a day. Occasionally on a weekend, I do more. I like reading about the lives and activities of “Friends.” I love gossip and I am a social voyeur. I cannot read in airports because I just love watching people. FB is a place to celebrate, complain, inform and to feed the narcissistic self without much damage or need for rebuttal. Call me insecure, but I like knowing what people think about me and my ideas. Because I like being liked – I always check to see if my status updates have created a reaction or if people are in agreement or disagreement with my sage advice. I confess I like it when there are a lot of comments to my status update. I don’t think that makes me a maniacal, egotistical, self-absorbed creature. It does validate opinions but more often provides me with new ideas or ways to think about a topic.

I discover FB is exactly what I choose to make it. I can freely post comments, pictures, notes and links to other sources. I can remove them as freely as I post them. If I don’t like a post or an attitude, I can hit the “x” spot and it is gone or disappears. I can choose my friends, I can eliminate them if they anger me, and I can hide material from my family and friends if I don’t want them to know about that one wild and crazy evening in Palma, Majorca. It is not an illusion that I have more control over the content on FB than is generally understood. The FB critics in the universe are all alarmed about privacy issues on FB. My name, ideas, my key words are being sold to advertisers. Hello – what’s new? Ever since the advent of commercial communications you have been sold to advertisers without your permission. Either I am a very boring person or I have “aged out” of most of the commercial market except for Depends or Viagra. I don’t seem to get a lot of advertising that I don’t want to see.

I love the people, who with a tone of self-righteousness tell me I don’t want people to see my private information or I don’t have the need to post my life all over the internet. Well, that is fine – but I also suspect these good folk need a foil to let everyone know they are unique or different. It was like me in the mid-70s saying, “I will never use a computer to write or publish my ideas. If it can’t be done on a typewriter, I am not publishing it.” I mean really, once IBM came out with eraser ribbon, what more did you need? Eventually, I caved.

It is okay not to use FB, but don’t judge those of us who use it for a way to communicate without duplicating communication. I now have told my staff and colleagues, if you want to know what I am doing or what I am thinking, I suggest you friend me on FB. This has saved countless e-mails, reports and duplication of communication. It is a record of my journey, often my ideas and a place to learn. I picked up three new clients, five consultants and been exposed to great ideas on FB. And when I share an idea, I get a quick poll on its merits or interest. To my friends and colleagues – it is okay to be on FB. You are not a bad person and it is not necessarily an evaluation of your social life that you spend an hour or two a day in front of the inviting blue colors of FB hoping somebody will respond to your most recent status update. Make FB what you want it to be.

Right now, I am hoping that Mark Zuckerberg is reading this defense of his social network invention and wanting to “Friend” me so he can fund my many humanitarian projects throughout the world. After all FB is all about me. Really, it is!

Remembering those who Remember: Warriors of Mercy and Centers of Compassion

Monday, December 20th, 2010 ·
by James Copple

The Nyanza Province in Western Kenya is one of the poorest in all of Africa and thus, one of the poorest in the world. Kisumu is the regional capitol, a bustling city on the edge IMG_7639 (800x533)of Lake Victoria. It struggles to become the economic and social engine of the region. However, its rural surroundings with its subsistence farmers hang like a weight around Kisumu’s neck. This is the epicenter – ground zero – in the global effort to eradicate poverty and to stem the tide of disease and death exacerbated by HIV and AIDS.

The front in this war against death is made up of soldiers of mercy and compassion. They dot the countryside wearing their red crosses, driving their CDC, UN and USAID vehicles. They ride bicycles and walk dusty roads to find homesteads of orphans and widows. They pack into the crowded Mutatus that speed across the countryside. Their weapons are the tools of information – pamphlets, Bibles, videos and word of mouth. In their arsenal are the cocktails of antiretroviral medications, de-worming tablets and chlorine dispensers purifying water for a day – maybe two.

I watched women in three separate centers of compassion mobilized to serve the weak and vulnerable of the region – Children. They are part of a network of NGOs and Churches responding to the invasion of hopelessness that fills the life of an orphan. These warriors of mercy say NO – they shout NO to the darkness that envelopes the desperate but resilient lives of their community.

Two men – young men in years yet made wise by what they have witnessed on these fields of conflict work daily hanging on to their vision – something can and must be done. They are two in a single denomination that have become a part of a tapestry of compassion found in this region. This is a tapestry of Protestants, Catholics, Muslims, NGOs and Government agencies.

I watched Rev. Samuel Oketch and Dan Friday receive a report from Maurice Myiayi – a farmer and husband of the pastor of the local Nazarene Church in this community. Maurice works with over 1,400 orphans and trains them in the art and science of raising maize, watermelons, beans, mangos and much more. His smile seems to stretch across the valley when he reports on the profit made from his watermelon sales. Over $1,000 US or KSH 80,000 were generated from one year of work. He will be able to find more children, feed more children, and clothe more children with these resources.

What has impressed me most about their work and this specific ministry of one denomination serving in Africa is both the isolation of the work and the commitment to service. While connected to a specific denominational structure – Nazarene Compassionate Ministries of the Church of the Nazarene, these agents of rescue and service move forward in almost complete anonymity from the mainstream work of the denomination. They show up every day realizing that what they do is often misunderstood or even worse – ignored. While I was with them, I imagined what was going on from day to day in the life of the average American or European congregation. To be sure there are struggles and challenges in the Churches of the Northern Hemisphere, but they pale in comparison to the monumental task of responding to the crisis that is orphans and vulnerable children in Africa. Located in remote villages with impossible names to spell and located along roads or cow paths sit these centers of mercy and compassion that inherently beg for attention – but often go unnoticed.

They are tethered to a Field Office in Nairobi located some 260 miles away who in turn is tethered to a regional office in Johannesburg that is 4,000 miles away who in turn is tethered to a denominational office in Kansas City that is 10,000 miles away. In the mission headquarters of the Church in Kenya, work three individuals – one from compassionate ministries and two others from the Kenya Church leadership who work behind the scenes to scrounge every additional Shilling they can find. In conversations you can feel how tortured they become when their resources fail to match the need.

This work is supported through tithes and offerings and designated gifts from the Church of the Nazarene. However, this work is also funded in part by USAID and an Orphans and Vulnerable Children grant to World Concern. World Concern and other development agencies need centers like Compassionate Ministries to deliver critical services in the most remote parts of the country. They simply could not fulfill their mission without Sam and Dan and the community health workers supported by local churches.

Yet, in a country of 11 million youth with 60% unemployment in the age cohort between 18 and 35, Sam and Dan face a daily tsunami of suffering and need. The waves of pain arriving at their front door seldom stop. When Sam was asked, is there any evidence that his efforts are making any difference, he responded, “By and large it is my firm conviction that NCM_OVC program have fulfilled her God given mandate that ‘What God the Father considers to be pure and genuine religion is this: to take care of orphans and widows in their suffering and to keep oneself from being corrupted by the world. (James 1:27).’”

This is the Nazarene Compassionate Ministries – Kenya Orphans and Vulnerable Children program. It is time we remember those who remember the orphans and vulnerable children – it is time that we fret less about the politics of compassion found in our national capitols and denominational organizations and remember that today men and women of the Nyanza province are waking up to the suffering of many and responding with the work of a few. These few, however, find meaning in the God given mandate to care for the orphans. Regardless of our denominational affiliation, our country of origin or the color of our skin – God’s call to care for the orphans transcends the petty diversions that move us off mission. Today I want to remember – today I want to stand with Sam and Dan and become a warrior for mercy. Remember them so they can remember the orphan.

To Find Ways to Help in this Work go to www.servantforge.org. or contact Jim Copple at jcopple@sai-dc.com.

WAR and Those Who Fight Them

Thursday, July 8th, 2010 ·
by James Copple

My favorite childhood game was WAR.  I was born in 1949, and by the time I was ten, only fifteen years after the end of WW II, I think I played WAR every day.  Complete with stick guns and rocks for grenades, the children in our suburban working class neighborhood fought the Germans we called “Krauts” and fended off the Japanese we called “Japs” with ferocious tenacity.  Most of our parents were Veterans.  My best friend’s father earned the Distinguished Flying Cross piloting a B-29 bomber over the Pulaski Oil Fields in Europe.  My father served in the Pacific and my friend Eddie Golden – his father was wounded at Normandy. 

Hollywood bolstered images of glory with the Audie Murphy story and the Longest Day was my favorite childhood movie.  As a child playing war you would get shot, fall down, count to ten and then pop back up with stick gun blazing.   Such childhood games strengthened our courage and our capacity to distinguish between right and wrong.   The enemy was clearly identified, the goal fully understood and the outcome assured.  Then came Vietnam and much of our fighting force were draftees and the political goals ambiguous at best.  My friends and family were conscripted to fight an unpopular war that was now brought into our homes with the advent of television.  It didn’t take long for the national resolve on Vietnam to collapse before a skeptical world.  Our soldiers came home and there were no celebrations or flags thanking them for their service.  In fact their service was often ridiculed and many veterans felt some shame or rejection by their country.

Now we have a volunteer army engaged in two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  The current volunteer army is made up of recruits that remember 9/11 and want to be part of the national effort to extract our pound of flesh.   Forget failed policy or ineptness in execution by our policy leaders; let’s focus for a few moments on the tip-of-the-spear.   The combat infantry soldier in the most remote and dangerous post in Afghanistan faces a war of insurgency that requires tactics and firepower that stagger the imagination.  After a year of being embedded with a battle hardened platoon in the Korengal Valley in Afghanistan, Sebastian Junger published his account of the daily existence of the combat infantry soldier in his new book, War.  

When understood from the perspective of the daily foot soldier engaged in combat – war is an adrenaline rush unparalleled in our development as males.   I say males, because current US Policy prohibits women from serving in front line combat units.  Make no mistake about it – women are dying in these wars and paying a huge price as they support the combat unit.  Junger discovered that combat is not about the big picture or advancing some noble policy conceived in Washington, it is about taking care of your brother.  There is choreography in combat that enables you to address your fears, creates the capacity to kill and then to finally demonstrate a love that is comparable to our language of faith – he laid down his life for another. 

Junger describes relationships that were strained and men who simply did not like each other, but when the firefight started, they become a seamless unit and will exhibit all manner of behavior that to us is courageous but to them is only natural.  They would do anything to save the very person they were fighting or hated hours before.  When a member of this volunteer army serving at the tip-of-the-spear in combat describes the reasons for enlistment, it is often escape from abusive families, the law or failed relationships.  Also, for many it was about taking it to the people that destroyed the Twin Towers or threatened the security of our Country.   It isn’t policy – it is street justice – when punched we will punch back and punch back with a force unparalleled in the history of warfare. 
  
I have never been in combat.  I don’t want to assume I have any grasp of what a combat platoon in the Korengal Valley in Afghanistan endures.  Three or four firefights a day and then weeks of boredom, eating one hot meal a day if you were lucky characterizes the routine of the combat infantry soldier.  They go months between showers and clean clothes.  I have had several near-death experiences that spiked or caused a physiological response that is similar.  Yet, I have never had to live with the day-in and day-out experience of a deployment in a combat zone.   Combat has got to be the single most persistently terrifying experience of any organized community.  

Afghanistan is a war that has not required much of us living at home.  I have had two former students and one former family friend killed in Iraq or Afghanistan.  Two were killed by an IED and the other was killed in an ambush and shot nine times.  I have tried to imagine their deaths and the intense environment that defined their lives before they were killed.  I can see them in the classroom where I once taught them and the living room where they once played.  I can’t quite get there emotionally to understand the pain, the isolation or the fear that defined their existence in a remote village or community in Iraq or Afghanistan.  Junger’s book took me as close as I can get sitting in an easy chair in Alexandria, Virginia. 

These soldiers fight because they are told to – they fight because the act of combat takes them psychologically to a place and a “rush” that is unequaled in their journey.   They volunteer or go willingly to a second or a sixth tour.  They find brotherhood and purpose in protecting inches of territory in remote parts of the world.  When they come home they will bring all that baggage with them.  I am not sure we are ready for their return.  However, the sooner we bring them home the stronger they will be, the better we will be as a nation and frankly, the more secure we will be as a nation.

As I read Junger’s book, I felt shame for not understanding, anger for failure to advocate for our veterans and a resolve to begin working to make our nation more secure by getting the hell out of Iraq and Afghanistan as soon as possible.  For us as a nation, the collateral damage of this war will be the men and women who fight it and return home to a nation that hardly noticed they went.
 
Today two more American men were killed in Afghanistan – fifty-nine killed in the month of June.  If we civilians could somehow get inside the bubble of combat – then perhaps there would be less need for combat.  Bad guys will continue to threaten us and we will continue to send our youth into the fire – but what a price we pay for our failure to build bridges instead of walls. 

To the combat veteran hunkered down this evening behind some sandbag in a remote part of Afghanistan eating one more MRE – thank you – and never has an expression of thanks seemed so inadequate.

The Balkanized Church

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010 ·
by James Copple

Balkanization: To break up (as a region or group) into
smaller and hostile units.
Webster’s Dictionary

Balkanization is a term coined to describe the political and ethnic
divisions in that region of the world known as the Balkans.

For the past 30 years I have worked internationally in a variety of
capacities. Most of my focus has been on international development,
substance abuse and crime prevention and most recently mobilizing and
capacitating communities to respond to the HIV & AIDS pandemic sweeping
across Africa. Of particular interest and concern to me has been the
role of the Church and NGOs in responding to poverty and disease. For
the purposes of this article, I intend to focus on the Church.

The Church is organized and works within geographic and political
boundaries. It cannot escape them – yet, the Church often claims to
transcend them by virtue of the nature of the gospel it proclaims.
Balkanization, a term often used to define political and social sectors
has created political division and been the source of conflict for
decades if not centuries. Well, Balkanization is also a source of
conflict and struggle within the Church.

The “Church” is not nor has it ever been an easy entity to define.
Throughout my journey, I have worshipped with Nazarenes, Methodists,
Anglicans and even Mormons. My academic background is in the History of
the Western Church. I take pride in the fact, that I have studied,
thought about and engaged the Church in diverse and multi-faceted ways.
I have a love-hate relationship with this creation of man. Yes, there
are those that will dispute the claim that the Church is created by man.
To be sure the community of faith is a called out community – but the
current institutional expressions of that community defy any connection
to its New Testament roots.

The Church created by man to organize his/her beliefs and to find some
kind of fellowship with people of like mind, is something different to
each individual who encounters her. For me the Church has been home,
family, a refuge and a constant source of frustration. As one of my
Seminary professors use to remind us: “The Church is scandalous humanity
seeking God’s grace and forgiveness in a community that continually
seeks perfection.” That reminder has kept me coming back to the “Church”
throughout my life. But I often question what it is I have come back to
and is it really a universal community.

Today, unfortunately, the Church is as balkanized as it has ever been. A
gospel that is universal finds itself captured by the geographic, ethnic
and ideological boundaries of the people who created it and who serve in
it. Church growth, cultural anthropologists and cultural competency
experts stress the importance of accommodating the gospel to the
particular social and cultural regions of the world. We preach that the
Christ confronts and transforms all cultures and yet we seek to package
our Christ in cultural terms that often create an ecclesiology that is
as diverse as the nations of the world. This reality has forced the
Church to think regionally and structure itself in ways that assure the
inclusion of all regions in the shaping of polity and doctrine. In this
reality – there is seldom any cross-cultural or cross-political
accommodation.

Seldom do conversations about differences in Church polity across
regions begin with the common source of our salvation – Jesus Christ. It
usually begins with why you and your culture don’t understand me and my
culture. Therefore I and my culture are sovereign over you and your
culture – especially if you are living or working in my culture.

Jaroslav Pelikan, noted historian of Christian thought at Yale
University says, and I paraphrase, doctrine is that which the Church
teaches, believes and confesses in response to internal and external
threats. Doctrine or for that matter polity or governance are seldom
positive affirmations but rather structures created to protect or
defend. In his work, The Christian Tradition: A History of the
Development of Doctrine
, Pelikan lays out a pretty convincing case.
I have to concur. In the practice of the Church, regardless of
denomination, seldom does the transcending message of the gospel
actually transcend the political realities of the region. We can stand
in Christian worship and in circles of fellowship and affirm the
universality of God’s love and grace, but when that love and grace needs
structure or organization love and grace usually collapses under the
weight of regional, geographic and even ethnic ideology.

I believe a central theme of the gospel as it relates to our coming
together is found in Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek,
there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for
you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Imagine if we took that literally
and seriously. Imagine that such divisions were sacrificed on the altar
of unity and we were known for our love and compassion and not our
geographic division, or ethnic difference or even more salient our
gender. Imagine governance that was anchored in trust, reconciliation
and a mutual goal to make Christ-Like Disciples of the Nations. Imagine
a world that really was not a world to be imagined but a world that
truly was anchored in faith and action – faith in our God and faith in
each other.

Haiti and the Underbelly of Poverty

Sunday, January 17th, 2010 ·
by James Copple

Haiti and the Underbelly of Poverty
By
James E. Copple

Disasters of all types expose the weak underbelly of poverty. Hurricanes, earthquakes, tornados and political turmoil make the poor vulnerable and create challenges for humanitarian responses. The earthquake in Haiti is a classic example. As nations respond to this crippling blow of Mother Nature in the poorest nation in the western hemisphere, responders struggle with a nation with little or no social or economic infrastructure. It is a reality that existed before the earthquake or before the four hurricanes of 2008 or before the political turmoil of the past decade. Haiti is poor, it has always been poor and we have always known it is poor. Nations have allowed the political unrest of the past half century to hinder or prevent them from assisting with economic and political development. Sentimental reflection from politicians across the globe on the greatness of the Haitian people is no substitute for tangible and real action.
This catastrophe has catapulted Haiti and its collapsed infrastructure into the headlines and should catapult it into our conscience. To be sure, we will and we must respond with humanitarian aid that seeks to address the immediate crisis of health and safety. The world is sending a record number of materials, supplies, medical teams and relief that will seek to stanch this critical wound. However, as we move forward over time, we must also seek to address the infrastructure of Haiti’s political and economic world. Governments, humanitarian organizations and people of faith have known of Haiti’s vulnerability and shoveled aid into this broken country hoping to save a life here or there. Partners in Health, World Vision, the United Nations all have strong presence in this country and have delivered critical AID. However, despite these heroic efforts, these same organizations are now suffering under the weight of a broken infrastructure and system that, if working properly, could have mitigated the depth and scope of the earthquake’s impact.
In countries like Haiti, it is not if a crisis will happen it is when. Today, I write this blog from Kenya a nation on the edge and precipice of political turmoil and perhaps collapse. This year 750,000 young people will graduate from secondary school and only 250,000 of them will find jobs. Only 10% of the remaining 500,000 have the necessary skills for employment. Inside the Kibera Housing Slum and other slums in and around Nairobi, there is anxiety and tension as the youth population continues to grow and the economy continues to shrink. The political structures are locked in the tribal conflicts that defined this nation long before the ravages of colonialism. Nobody likes to call it tribal, because the crisis is certainly more than tribal; it is about jobs, weakened infrastructure and the West’s failure to understand that our policies in the Sudan and Somalia have helped create the current crisis in Kenya.
NGOs, faith-based organizations and humanitarian organizations should prepare now for the earthquake that will hit Kenya within the next several years. It may not be an earthquake of the geological type, but an economic and political earthquake. In the post election violence of late 2007, over a 1,000 people were killed. The numbers could be much higher if humanitarian and educational organizations do not work with all governments to address the economic and political house of straw supporting this particular government.
It is a task and action that we should have been addressing in Haiti. All of our good words, huge humanitarian response and sympathy for Haiti does not absolve of us of our failure to address the underbelly of poverty that has defined this nation for so many decades. The earthquake and the hurricanes before it have given us a snapshot of the desperate poverty that defines this country. After the humanitarian response – what will we do to address the poverty? How we answer that question in Haiti and in other impoverished nations around the globe will determine our capacity to be humane.
To support a humanitarian response in Haiti, go to www.ncm.org and make a contribution to disaster relief. Then over the next several decades donate time, resources and intellectual, spiritual and moral capital to strengthen the social and economic infrastructure of this country.

Obama and Self-Righteous Exclusion

Friday, November 27th, 2009 ·
by James Copple

Obama and Self-Righteous Exclusion

By

James E. Copple

 

I voted for Barack Obama for President and if the election were held again today, I would vote for Barack Obama.  While a life-long democrat, I have always found myself in the unique position of being a part of the loyal opposition.  Seldom has a President met my expectations and Obama is no different. Frankly, as part of the loyal position, I have found myself supporting policies of the party outside of power more than the policies of the party in power. 

Currently, I find myself asking – what is this administration doing?  After nearly a year in office we are finally going to get a strategy for Afghanistan, health care reform, despite the fact that we will actually have a debate is still very illusive, abolishing don’t ask – don’t tell remains a campaign promise and the outcomes of the stimulus package are lost in 10 percent unemployment.  Still, more than 60 percent of presidential appointments are not filled and only recently did he fill the most critical position of Administrator of USAID.    Not a very impressive record to date.

I am weary of this administration’s self-righteous rhetoric around governance.  On the Friday after Thanksgiving, the administration once again took a swipe at the role of lobbyists in government and they continue to frame the image of a lobbyist as all lobbyists are Jack Abramoff. 

The most recent assault on our constitutional right to petition government is the administration’s effort to prevent lobbyists from serving on government advisory panels.  They couch their argument in the need to bring fresh voices into the process and to fight the self interests of lobbyists that might guide these advisory committees to support their pet projects.  Lost in this process is the fact that anybody petitioning government is required by law to register (unless you are Tom Daschle) and that not all lobbyists are Jack Abramoff or his contemporaries.  Further, the refusal to include the content expertise of this group of activists is denying the American people years of experience and education in developing policy.  Obama is playing to the cheap seats with this strategy.  Appealing to the scandal weary voter, he lumps the whole population of lobbyists into the categories of self-serving and greedy.

Congress is dependent on those who lobby to help inform and develop legislation.  Members of Congress and the administration need the research capabilities, the policy expertise and the experience of this class of citizens to institutionalize legislation and develop effective policy.  This most recent attack, in the name of government reform, is forcing our leaders to develop policy in the dark.  We can regulate the activities of lobbyists and we can monitor with effective regulation issues of self-interest.  But eliminating this important resource in the development of policy and programs is short sighted, arrogant and denying the American people access to some of our nation’s most creative and informed minds.